Discover / Rankings

Find your kind of excellence.

University reputation, career strength and value.

University rankings

Univised · Consulting

1× = expected career presence · † estimated rating · — insufficient evidence to rank · Click a rating for details.

How these rankings work

Positions follow the numeric rating, including estimates, within the informed comparison. They stay the same when you filter. Numeric positions are not claims of statistical precision. Schools with only a broad fallback retain a numeric rating but have no meaningful individual position; they appear afterwards with a dash.

1.4× is an evidence-adjusted estimate of 40% greater career presence than the sampled cohort benchmark—not a 40% greater chance of being hired. Raw recorded ratios remain available inside each rating.

All direct ratings use the same gradual adjustment toward 1×. Small expected counts and disagreement between cohort definitions receive more adjustment; crossing a market-count threshold never changes the scoring formula. The stability setting is 25 expected appearances and is not a fitted probability model.

Missing observations may use compatible-school estimates, considering institution type, subject mix, size, selectivity, completion, geography and comparable traditional rankings. Donors contribute their adjusted ratings, not raw spikes. Sparse peer groups receive extra adjustment. No school receives a name-based boost.

If compatible peers are insufficient, or the industry's peer model fails its held-out checks, we show a neutral 1× fallback without an individual position. This is an unknown result, not evidence of average outcomes. The model does not verify programme availability.

The employment calibration sample is US-based. Estimates for other countries are explicitly marked as cross-country extrapolations, not locally observed employment rates. Neither observed nor estimated ratings are hiring probabilities.

Peer estimates did not beat both baselines; schools without direct evidence receive an unranked neutral fallback. These checks reconstruct historical signals, not future job offers or top-of-table accuracy.

Sampled roles: business analyst, junior consultant, research analyst. Markets: boston, california, london, new york, philadelphia + dc, texas. Employer baskets may overlap and cannot isolate individual-company outcomes.

Rank	University	Career presence
#60	American UniversityWashington · US	0.90×^† Evidence-adjusted career presence · raw counts available below. Limited confidence · 7 search appearances Approximate position group: #51–100. This is not a statistical confidence interval. How estimated Evidence-adjusted career presence. The 0.90× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Raw observed/expected ratio: 0.66×. The same continuous evidence adjustment applies to every school: 1 + evidence weight × (raw ratio − 1). Evidence weight: 0.278. Small expected cohorts and disagreement between cohort definitions reduce this weight. Traditional reputation does not change a direct rating. With alternative stability settings, this rating ranges from 0.83× to 0.94×. This is a model-sensitivity check, not a confidence interval or range of hiring odds. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability. Evidence across 1 of 6 sampled markets View market breakdown The observations below are supporting evidence for the estimate, not the modelled headline rating. Consulting · 7 recorded search appearances. 0.66× career presence. 7 recorded appearances ÷ 10.6 expected = 0.66×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 0.66× · whole-institution comparison 0.74×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston0.00×0 appearances California0.42×1 appearances London0.00×0 appearances New York0.00×0 appearances Philadelphia + Dc1.96×5 appearances Texas0.69×1 appearances Most recorded appearances are in one market. This concentration is shown separately, not deducted from career presence. Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds.
—	American University of Health SciencesSignal Hill · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.
—	Inter American University of Puerto Rico-AguadillaAguadilla · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.
—	Inter American University of Puerto Rico-AreciboArecibo · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.
—	Inter American University of Puerto Rico-BarranquitasBarranquitas · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.
—	Inter American University of Puerto Rico-BayamonBayamon · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.
—	Inter American University of Puerto Rico-FajardoFajardo · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.
—	Inter American University of Puerto Rico-GuayamaGuayama · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.
—	Inter American University of Puerto Rico-MetroSan Juan · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.
—	Inter American University of Puerto Rico-PonceMercedita · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.
—	Inter American University of Puerto Rico-San GermanSan German · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.
—	Inter American University of Puerto Rico-School of LawSan Juan · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.
—	Inter American University of Puerto Rico-School of OptometryBayamon · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.
—	National American University-Rapid CityRapid City · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.
—	North American UniversityStafford · US	1.00×^† Neutral fallback · insufficient evidence for a school-specific rating. Limited confidence How estimated Broad prior. The 1.00× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate. Insufficient comparable peers or unsupported peer-model performance. The neutral 1× fallback means unknown, not measured average outcomes; no individual rank is assigned. Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.

Sources & methodology