Discover / Rankings

Find your kind of excellence.

University reputation, career strength and value.

University rankings

Univised · Value

Observed earnings and career strength per sticker cost. Lower cost is a genuine advantage; higher-priced schools need stronger outcomes. Not a lifetime ROI forecast.

RankUniversityValue index
#23 Duke UniversityDurham · US · USD
1.04

Limited confidence

Cost and outcome breakdown

Annual tuition + living: $83,263.
Observed median earnings, 10 years after entry: $97,800.

Compared with the same eligible schools: 0.87× affordability · 1.18× earnings · 1.45× evidence-adjusted career strength.

Equal weight to earnings and career strength in a geometric average, multiplied by relative affordability. Career fields: Technology, Consulting, Finance and Accounting. Career inputs use the same continuous adjustment as industry rankings, not inferred peer outcomes. The ordering also checks sensitivity to individual markets.

Point estimate 1.14 · conservative Value index 1.04. These are model sensitivity checks, not statistical confidence bounds. No financial aid, taxes, loan interest or lifetime earnings are included. College Scorecard release 2025-05; cohorts vary.

View market breakdown

Technology · 470 recorded search appearances. 1.83× career presence.

470 recorded appearances ÷ 256.7 expected = 1.83×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts.

Raw field-cohort comparison 1.83× · whole-institution comparison 1.77×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment.

Boston0.92×5 appearances
California1.97×318 appearances
London2.78×5 appearances
New York2.39×111 appearances
Philadelphia + Dc1.27×16 appearances
Texas0.51×15 appearances

Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds.

Consulting · 47 recorded search appearances. 3.00× career presence.

47 recorded appearances ÷ 15.7 expected = 3.00×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts.

Raw field-cohort comparison 3.00× · whole-institution comparison 3.34×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment.

Boston1.15×1 appearances
California1.14×4 appearances
London0.00×0 appearances
New York5.40×28 appearances
Philadelphia + Dc2.93×11 appearances
Texas1.41×3 appearances

Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds.

Finance and Accounting · 9 recorded search appearances. 1.05× career presence.

9 recorded appearances ÷ 8.6 expected = 1.05×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts.

Raw field-cohort comparison 1.05× · whole-institution comparison 1.02×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment.

Boston0.00×0 appearances
California0.57×1 appearances
New York1.91×6 appearances
Philadelphia + Dc1.00×2 appearances
Texas0.00×0 appearances

Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds.

Sources & methodology