Discover / Rankings
Find your kind of excellence.
University reputation, career strength and value.
University rankings
Univised · Value
Observed earnings and career strength per sticker cost. Lower cost is a genuine advantage; higher-priced schools need stronger outcomes. Not a lifetime ROI forecast.
| Rank | University | Value index |
|---|---|---|
| #23 | Duke UniversityDurham · US · USD | 1.04Limited confidence Cost and outcome breakdownAnnual tuition + living: $83,263. Compared with the same eligible schools: 0.87× affordability · 1.18× earnings · 1.45× evidence-adjusted career strength. Equal weight to earnings and career strength in a geometric average, multiplied by relative affordability. Career fields: Technology, Consulting, Finance and Accounting. Career inputs use the same continuous adjustment as industry rankings, not inferred peer outcomes. The ordering also checks sensitivity to individual markets. Point estimate 1.14 · conservative Value index 1.04. These are model sensitivity checks, not statistical confidence bounds. No financial aid, taxes, loan interest or lifetime earnings are included. College Scorecard release 2025-05; cohorts vary. View market breakdownTechnology · 470 recorded search appearances. 1.83× career presence. 470 recorded appearances ÷ 256.7 expected = 1.83×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 1.83× · whole-institution comparison 1.77×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston0.92×5 appearances California1.97×318 appearances London2.78×5 appearances New York2.39×111 appearances Philadelphia + Dc1.27×16 appearances Texas0.51×15 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. Consulting · 47 recorded search appearances. 3.00× career presence. 47 recorded appearances ÷ 15.7 expected = 3.00×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 3.00× · whole-institution comparison 3.34×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston1.15×1 appearances California1.14×4 appearances London0.00×0 appearances New York5.40×28 appearances Philadelphia + Dc2.93×11 appearances Texas1.41×3 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. Finance and Accounting · 9 recorded search appearances. 1.05× career presence. 9 recorded appearances ÷ 8.6 expected = 1.05×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 1.05× · whole-institution comparison 1.02×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston0.00×0 appearances California0.57×1 appearances New York1.91×6 appearances Philadelphia + Dc1.00×2 appearances Texas0.00×0 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. |