Discover / Rankings
Find your kind of excellence.
University reputation, career strength and value.
University rankings
Univised · Value
Observed earnings and career strength per sticker cost. Lower cost is a genuine advantage; higher-priced schools need stronger outcomes. Not a lifetime ROI forecast.
| Rank | University | Value index |
|---|---|---|
| #10 | Harvard UniversityCambridge · US · USD | 1.21Medium confidence Cost and outcome breakdownAnnual tuition + living: $79,450. Compared with the same eligible schools: 0.92× affordability · 1.23× earnings · 1.65× evidence-adjusted career strength. Equal weight to earnings and career strength in a geometric average, multiplied by relative affordability. Career fields: Technology, Consulting, Finance and Accounting. Career inputs use the same continuous adjustment as industry rankings, not inferred peer outcomes. The ordering also checks sensitivity to individual markets. Point estimate 1.30 · conservative Value index 1.21. These are model sensitivity checks, not statistical confidence bounds. No financial aid, taxes, loan interest or lifetime earnings are included. College Scorecard release 2025-05; cohorts vary. View market breakdownTechnology · 364 recorded search appearances. 1.31× career presence. 364 recorded appearances ÷ 278.2 expected = 1.31×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 1.31× · whole-institution comparison 0.95×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston2.89×17 appearances California1.23×214 appearances London4.10×8 appearances New York2.04×103 appearances Philadelphia + Dc0.81×11 appearances Texas0.35×11 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. Consulting · 80 recorded search appearances. 4.22× career presence. 80 recorded appearances ÷ 19.0 expected = 4.22×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 4.22× · whole-institution comparison 3.93×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston7.59×8 appearances California3.79×16 appearances London3.18×1 appearances New York5.10×32 appearances Philadelphia + Dc4.63×21 appearances Texas0.78×2 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. Finance and Accounting · 31 recorded search appearances. 2.73× career presence. 31 recorded appearances ÷ 11.3 expected = 2.73×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 2.73× · whole-institution comparison 2.42×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston3.17×2 appearances California1.73×4 appearances New York4.55×19 appearances Philadelphia + Dc1.51×4 appearances Texas1.28×2 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. |