Discover / Rankings
Find your kind of excellence.
University reputation, career strength and value.
University rankings
Univised · Value
Observed earnings and career strength per sticker cost. Lower cost is a genuine advantage; higher-priced schools need stronger outcomes. Not a lifetime ROI forecast.
| Rank | University | Value index |
|---|---|---|
| #14 | University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill · US · USD | 1.15Limited confidence Cost and outcome breakdownAnnual tuition + living: $52,346. Compared with the same eligible schools: 1.39× affordability · 0.87× earnings · 0.85× evidence-adjusted career strength. Equal weight to earnings and career strength in a geometric average, multiplied by relative affordability. Career fields: Technology, Consulting, Finance and Accounting. Career inputs use the same continuous adjustment as industry rankings, not inferred peer outcomes. The ordering also checks sensitivity to individual markets. Point estimate 1.19 · conservative Value index 1.15. These are model sensitivity checks, not statistical confidence bounds. No financial aid, taxes, loan interest or lifetime earnings are included. College Scorecard release 2025-05; cohorts vary. View market breakdownTechnology · 174 recorded search appearances. 0.66× career presence. 174 recorded appearances ÷ 264.8 expected = 0.66×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 0.66× · whole-institution comparison 0.45×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston0.54×3 appearances California0.67×112 appearances London0.00×0 appearances New York0.83×40 appearances Philadelphia + Dc0.62×8 appearances Texas0.36×11 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. Consulting · 16 recorded search appearances. 0.83× career presence. 16 recorded appearances ÷ 19.2 expected = 0.83×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 0.83× · whole-institution comparison 0.77×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston0.94×1 appearances California0.47×2 appearances London0.00×0 appearances New York1.26×8 appearances Philadelphia + Dc1.09×5 appearances Texas0.00×0 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. Finance and Accounting · 10 recorded search appearances. 0.84× career presence. 10 recorded appearances ÷ 12.0 expected = 0.84×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 0.84× · whole-institution comparison 0.77×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston0.00×0 appearances California0.41×1 appearances New York0.45×2 appearances Philadelphia + Dc1.78×5 appearances Texas1.21×2 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. |