Discover / Rankings
Find your kind of excellence.
University reputation, career strength and value.
University rankings
Univised · Value
Observed earnings and career strength per sticker cost. Lower cost is a genuine advantage; higher-priced schools need stronger outcomes. Not a lifetime ROI forecast.
| Rank | University | Value index |
|---|---|---|
| #6 | University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia · US · USD | 1.26Medium confidence Cost and outcome breakdownAnnual tuition + living: $84,600. Compared with the same eligible schools: 0.86× affordability · 1.34× earnings · 1.84× evidence-adjusted career strength. Equal weight to earnings and career strength in a geometric average, multiplied by relative affordability. Career fields: Technology, Consulting, Finance and Accounting. Career inputs use the same continuous adjustment as industry rankings, not inferred peer outcomes. The ordering also checks sensitivity to individual markets. Point estimate 1.35 · conservative Value index 1.26. These are model sensitivity checks, not statistical confidence bounds. No financial aid, taxes, loan interest or lifetime earnings are included. College Scorecard release 2025-05; cohorts vary. View market breakdownTechnology · 790 recorded search appearances. 2.36× career presence. 790 recorded appearances ÷ 334.8 expected = 2.36×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 2.36× · whole-institution comparison 2.03×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston0.85×6 appearances California2.21×464 appearances London2.98×7 appearances New York3.15×191 appearances Philadelphia + Dc6.46×106 appearances Texas0.42×16 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. Consulting · 100 recorded search appearances. 4.16× career presence. 100 recorded appearances ÷ 24.1 expected = 4.16×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 4.16× · whole-institution comparison 4.84×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston2.24×3 appearances California1.87×10 appearances London7.53×3 appearances New York4.66×37 appearances Philadelphia + Dc7.64×44 appearances Texas0.92×3 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. Finance and Accounting · 25 recorded search appearances. 1.37× career presence. 25 recorded appearances ÷ 18.2 expected = 1.37×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 1.37× · whole-institution comparison 1.92×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston0.00×0 appearances California2.69×10 appearances New York1.04×7 appearances Philadelphia + Dc1.88×8 appearances Texas0.00×0 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. |