Discover / Rankings
Find your kind of excellence.
University reputation, career strength and value.
University rankings
Univised · Value
Observed earnings and career strength per sticker cost. Lower cost is a genuine advantage; higher-priced schools need stronger outcomes. Not a lifetime ROI forecast.
| Rank | University | Value index |
|---|---|---|
| #27 | Vanderbilt UniversityNashville · US · USD | 0.97Limited confidence Cost and outcome breakdownAnnual tuition + living: $85,000. Compared with the same eligible schools: 0.86× affordability · 1.10× earnings · 1.35× evidence-adjusted career strength. Equal weight to earnings and career strength in a geometric average, multiplied by relative affordability. Career fields: Technology, Consulting, Finance and Accounting. Career inputs use the same continuous adjustment as industry rankings, not inferred peer outcomes. The ordering also checks sensitivity to individual markets. Point estimate 1.05 · conservative Value index 0.97. These are model sensitivity checks, not statistical confidence bounds. No financial aid, taxes, loan interest or lifetime earnings are included. College Scorecard release 2025-05; cohorts vary. View market breakdownTechnology · 176 recorded search appearances. 1.22× career presence. 176 recorded appearances ÷ 143.8 expected = 1.22×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 1.22× · whole-institution comparison 0.95×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston0.66×2 appearances California1.12×101 appearances London0.00×0 appearances New York1.96×51 appearances Philadelphia + Dc1.28×9 appearances Texas0.79×13 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. Consulting · 46 recorded search appearances. 5.20× career presence. 46 recorded appearances ÷ 8.8 expected = 5.20×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 5.20× · whole-institution comparison 4.67×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston0.00×0 appearances California3.55×7 appearances London6.83×1 appearances New York8.90×26 appearances Philadelphia + Dc2.84×6 appearances Texas5.01×6 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. Finance and Accounting · 7 recorded search appearances. 1.24× career presence. 7 recorded appearances ÷ 5.7 expected = 1.24×. Expected counts use the same sampled schools and their estimated field cohorts. Raw field-cohort comparison 1.24× · whole-institution comparison 1.13×. Differences between these cohort definitions inform the rating's evidence adjustment. Boston0.00×0 appearances California2.60×3 appearances New York0.96×2 appearances Philadelphia + Dc0.76×1 appearances Texas1.28×1 appearances Raw overall presence adds observed counts across comparable markets and divides by their total expected counts. Local raw presence uses only that market. These raw ratios are preserved; headline rankings apply an additional evidence adjustment. Counts may overlap; these are historical appearances, not unique people or hiring odds. |