$50,604
Grouped estimate · Medium evidence.
Related subjects at 12 matched peer institutions · master's
Historical archive, not a current salary estimate.
Public policy & social services
Public Policy Analysis
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley · Edinburg, TX
Medium evidenceMatched peers12 institutions · related subjectsSee the evidence
The degree in numbers
Cost & earnings.
Earnings context
One career stage.
A clearer comparison.
USD · Master's · 2 years after completion
Same source release. National references exclude this degree.
Behind the number
Your comparison group.
Related subjects at 12 matched peer institutions · master's
Grouped estimate. Middle half of comparison values: $46,314–$51,894.
Historical earnings archive. College Scorecard legacy FOS archive (file dated 2022-01-19; cohorts vary). Do not interpret this as today's graduate salary. Further study and career changes are not modelled by this early-career figure.
| Institution & subject | Reported earnings |
|---|---|
| Sam Houston State UniversityPublic Administration | $63,005 |
| The University of Texas at San AntonioPublic Administration, Social Work | $50,618 |
| The University of Texas at ArlingtonPublic Administration, Social Work | $52,251 |
| University of Massachusetts-BostonHuman Services, General, Public Administration | $57,770 |
| University of Nebraska at OmahaPublic Administration, Social Work | $50,590 |
| Western Michigan UniversityPublic Administration, Social Work | $47,277 |
| East Tennessee State UniversitySocial Work | $37,907 |
| University of Wisconsin-MilwaukeePublic Administration, Social Work | $50,792 |
| Indiana University-IndianapolisPublic Administration, Social Work | $48,328 |
| Texas State UniversityPublic Administration, Social Work | $51,775 |
| Stephen F Austin State UniversityPublic Administration, Social Work | $43,426 |
| Boise State UniversityPublic Administration, Social Work | $43,168 |
How matching & uncertainty work
We first look for the same subject code (or exact subject name), qualification, country, currency, source release and earnings horizon. Peer institutions are matched using admissions selectivity, completion rates, undergraduate size and institution type, with a small preference for the same region. These are institutional proxies, not a ranking of programme quality.
If subject-matched peers are sparse, we try related subjects at closely matched universities, related degrees at this university, then an explicitly labelled national reference. We never multiply a salary by a university prestige score.
Peer and national estimates give each reporting institution one vote, after taking the median of its related programmes. Shared branch-campus outcomes count once. The middle-half range describes variation between reporting institutions. It is not an individual salary range or a statistical confidence interval.
Evidence labels describe match quality and coverage, not validated prediction accuracy. Admissions and size are undergraduate institutional measures, so graduate-degree comparisons are especially approximate.
Historical cohort outcomes are not promised salaries or a causal effect of attending this programme. College Scorecard earnings cover eligible federal-aid recipients, not every graduate or international student. Source definitions ↗