Tulane University of Louisiana

Evidence-adjusted career presence. The 0.98× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate.

Raw observed/expected ratio: 0.58×. The same continuous evidence adjustment applies to every school: 1 + evidence weight × (raw ratio − 1). Evidence weight: 0.037. Small expected cohorts and disagreement between cohort definitions reduce this weight. Traditional reputation does not change a direct rating.

With alternative stability settings, this rating ranges from 0.96× to 0.99×. This is a model-sensitivity check, not a confidence interval or range of hiring odds.

Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.

Evidence-adjusted career presence. The 0.47× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate.

Raw observed/expected ratio: 0.29×. The same continuous evidence adjustment applies to every school: 1 + evidence weight × (raw ratio − 1). Evidence weight: 0.746. Small expected cohorts and disagreement between cohort definitions reduce this weight. Traditional reputation does not change a direct rating.

With alternative stability settings, this rating ranges from 0.37× to 0.58×. This is a model-sensitivity check, not a confidence interval or range of hiring odds.

Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.

Evidence-adjusted career presence. The 0.75× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate.

Raw observed/expected ratio: 0.17×. The same continuous evidence adjustment applies to every school: 1 + evidence weight × (raw ratio − 1). Evidence weight: 0.304. Small expected cohorts and disagreement between cohort definitions reduce this weight. Traditional reputation does not change a direct rating.

With alternative stability settings, this rating ranges from 0.57× to 0.85×. This is a model-sensitivity check, not a confidence interval or range of hiring odds.

Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.

Evidence-adjusted career presence. The 0.78× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate.

Raw observed/expected ratio: 0.10×. The same continuous evidence adjustment applies to every school: 1 + evidence weight × (raw ratio − 1). Evidence weight: 0.248. Small expected cohorts and disagreement between cohort definitions reduce this weight. Traditional reputation does not change a direct rating.

With alternative stability settings, this rating ranges from 0.59× to 0.87×. This is a model-sensitivity check, not a confidence interval or range of hiring odds.

Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.

Evidence-adjusted career presence. The 0.99× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate.

Raw observed/expected ratio: 0.91×. The same continuous evidence adjustment applies to every school: 1 + evidence weight × (raw ratio − 1). Evidence weight: 0.102. Small expected cohorts and disagreement between cohort definitions reduce this weight. Traditional reputation does not change a direct rating.

With alternative stability settings, this rating ranges from 0.98× to 1.00×. This is a model-sensitivity check, not a confidence interval or range of hiring odds.

Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.

Evidence-adjusted career presence. The 0.83× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate.

Raw observed/expected ratio: 0.00×. The same continuous evidence adjustment applies to every school: 1 + evidence weight × (raw ratio − 1). Evidence weight: 0.172. Small expected cohorts and disagreement between cohort definitions reduce this weight. Traditional reputation does not change a direct rating.

With alternative stability settings, this rating ranges from 0.66× to 0.91×. This is a model-sensitivity check, not a confidence interval or range of hiring odds.

Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.