$47,846
Grouped estimate · Medium evidence.
Related subjects at 12 matched peer institutions · master's
Historical archive, not a current salary estimate.
Environment & natural resources
Environmental Control Technologies/Technicians
University of Massachusetts-Lowell · Lowell, MA
Medium evidenceMatched peers12 institutions · related subjectsSee the evidence
The degree in numbers
Cost & earnings.
Earnings context
One career stage.
A clearer comparison.
USD · Master's · 2 years after completion
Same source release. National references exclude this degree.
Behind the number
Your comparison group.
Related subjects at 12 matched peer institutions · master's
Grouped estimate. Middle half of comparison values: $42,682–$52,454.
Historical earnings archive. College Scorecard legacy FOS archive (file dated 2022-01-19; cohorts vary). Do not interpret this as today's graduate salary. Further study and career changes are not modelled by this early-career figure.
| Institution & subject | Reported earnings |
|---|---|
| University of New Hampshire-Main CampusNatural Resources Conservation and Research | $42,682 |
| Michigan Technological UniversityForestry | $45,696 |
| California State University-FullertonNatural Resources Conservation and Research | $62,012 |
| George Mason UniversityNatural Resources Conservation and Research | $54,974 |
| Colorado State University-Fort CollinsNatural Resources Conservation and Research | $52,107 |
| Oregon State UniversityForestry | $42,682 |
| University of North Carolina WilmingtonNatural Resources Conservation and Research | $32,391 |
| University of IdahoNatural Resources Conservation and Research | $51,482 |
| University of Missouri-ColumbiaNatural Resources Conservation and Research | $38,289 |
| The University of Texas at ArlingtonNatural Resources Conservation and Research | $48,432 |
| College of CharlestonNatural Resources Conservation and Research | $47,260 |
| Indiana University-BloomingtonNatural Resources Conservation and Research | $53,497 |
How matching & uncertainty work
We first look for the same subject code (or exact subject name), qualification, country, currency, source release and earnings horizon. Peer institutions are matched using admissions selectivity, completion rates, undergraduate size and institution type, with a small preference for the same region. These are institutional proxies, not a ranking of programme quality.
If subject-matched peers are sparse, we try related subjects at closely matched universities, related degrees at this university, then an explicitly labelled national reference. We never multiply a salary by a university prestige score.
Peer and national estimates give each reporting institution one vote, after taking the median of its related programmes. Shared branch-campus outcomes count once. The middle-half range describes variation between reporting institutions. It is not an individual salary range or a statistical confidence interval.
Evidence labels describe match quality and coverage, not validated prediction accuracy. Admissions and size are undergraduate institutional measures, so graduate-degree comparisons are especially approximate.
Historical cohort outcomes are not promised salaries or a causal effect of attending this programme. College Scorecard earnings cover eligible federal-aid recipients, not every graduate or international student. Source definitions ↗