$53,389
Grouped estimate · Medium evidence.
Same subject at 12 matched peer institutions · bachelor's
Historical archive, not a current salary estimate.
Business & management
Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
Washington State University · Pullman, WA
Medium evidenceMatched peers12 institutions · same subjectSee the evidence
The degree in numbers
Cost & earnings.
Earnings context
One career stage.
A clearer comparison.
USD · Bachelor's · 2 years after completion
Same source release. National references exclude this degree.
Behind the number
Your comparison group.
Same subject at 12 matched peer institutions · bachelor's
Grouped estimate. Middle half of comparison values: $47,177–$62,552.
Historical earnings archive. College Scorecard legacy FOS archive (file dated 2022-01-19; cohorts vary). Do not interpret this as today's graduate salary. Further study and career changes are not modelled by this early-career figure.
| Institution & subject | Reported earnings |
|---|---|
| University of IowaManagement Sciences and Quantitative Methods | $62,260 |
| California State University-FullertonManagement Sciences and Quantitative Methods | $42,682 |
| University of Illinois ChicagoManagement Sciences and Quantitative Methods | $42,123 |
| Illinois State UniversityManagement Sciences and Quantitative Methods | $48,112 |
| Temple UniversityManagement Sciences and Quantitative Methods | $69,732 |
| George Mason UniversityManagement Sciences and Quantitative Methods | $63,430 |
| University of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeManagement Sciences and Quantitative Methods | $52,107 |
| The University of Texas at San AntonioManagement Sciences and Quantitative Methods | $54,671 |
| University of Nebraska-LincolnManagement Sciences and Quantitative Methods | $64,493 |
| Central Michigan UniversityManagement Sciences and Quantitative Methods | $59,045 |
| Iowa State UniversityManagement Sciences and Quantitative Methods | $51,392 |
| Bridgewater State UniversityManagement Sciences and Quantitative Methods | $44,371 |
How matching & uncertainty work
We first look for the same subject code (or exact subject name), qualification, country, currency, source release and earnings horizon. Peer institutions are matched using admissions selectivity, completion rates, undergraduate size and institution type, with a small preference for the same region. These are institutional proxies, not a ranking of programme quality.
If subject-matched peers are sparse, we try related subjects at closely matched universities, related degrees at this university, then an explicitly labelled national reference. We never multiply a salary by a university prestige score.
Peer and national estimates give each reporting institution one vote, after taking the median of its related programmes. Shared branch-campus outcomes count once. The middle-half range describes variation between reporting institutions. It is not an individual salary range or a statistical confidence interval.
Evidence labels describe match quality and coverage, not validated prediction accuracy. Admissions and size are undergraduate institutional measures, so graduate-degree comparisons are especially approximate.
Historical cohort outcomes are not promised salaries or a causal effect of attending this programme. College Scorecard earnings cover eligible federal-aid recipients, not every graduate or international student. Source definitions ↗