Northeastern University

Evidence-adjusted career presence. The 0.82× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate.

Raw observed/expected ratio: 0.34×. The same continuous evidence adjustment applies to every school: 1 + evidence weight × (raw ratio − 1). Evidence weight: 0.276. Small expected cohorts and disagreement between cohort definitions reduce this weight. Traditional reputation does not change a direct rating.

With alternative stability settings, this rating ranges from 0.68× to 0.89×. This is a model-sensitivity check, not a confidence interval or range of hiring odds.

Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.

Evidence-adjusted career presence. The 2.30× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate.

Raw observed/expected ratio: 2.40×. The same continuous evidence adjustment applies to every school: 1 + evidence weight × (raw ratio − 1). Evidence weight: 0.929. Small expected cohorts and disagreement between cohort definitions reduce this weight. Traditional reputation does not change a direct rating.

With alternative stability settings, this rating ranges from 2.21× to 2.36×. This is a model-sensitivity check, not a confidence interval or range of hiring odds.

Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.

Evidence-adjusted career presence. The 1.36× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate.

Raw observed/expected ratio: 1.91×. The same continuous evidence adjustment applies to every school: 1 + evidence weight × (raw ratio − 1). Evidence weight: 0.391. Small expected cohorts and disagreement between cohort definitions reduce this weight. Traditional reputation does not change a direct rating.

With alternative stability settings, this rating ranges from 1.22× to 1.56×. This is a model-sensitivity check, not a confidence interval or range of hiring odds.

Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.

Evidence-adjusted career presence. The 1.54× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate.

Raw observed/expected ratio: 2.93×. The same continuous evidence adjustment applies to every school: 1 + evidence weight × (raw ratio − 1). Evidence weight: 0.282. Small expected cohorts and disagreement between cohort definitions reduce this weight. Traditional reputation does not change a direct rating.

With alternative stability settings, this rating ranges from 1.32× to 1.96×. This is a model-sensitivity check, not a confidence interval or range of hiring odds.

Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.

Evidence-adjusted career presence. The 1.36× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate.

Raw observed/expected ratio: 3.85×. The same continuous evidence adjustment applies to every school: 1 + evidence weight × (raw ratio − 1). Evidence weight: 0.125. Small expected cohorts and disagreement between cohort definitions reduce this weight. Traditional reputation does not change a direct rating.

With alternative stability settings, this rating ranges from 1.19× to 1.75×. This is a model-sensitivity check, not a confidence interval or range of hiring odds.

Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.

Evidence-adjusted career presence. The 0.79× headline is a modelled rating, not an observed employment rate.

Raw observed/expected ratio: 0.00×. The same continuous evidence adjustment applies to every school: 1 + evidence weight × (raw ratio − 1). Evidence weight: 0.205. Small expected cohorts and disagreement between cohort definitions reduce this weight. Traditional reputation does not change a direct rating.

With alternative stability settings, this rating ranges from 0.61× to 0.89×. This is a model-sensitivity check, not a confidence interval or range of hiring odds.

Position ranges group the model's ordering for readability; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Traditional reputation is a proxy, not evidence of placement in this industry or programme availability.